“If God
is good, why does He allow suffering?”
Better yet, HOW can a GOOD God allow suffering in the world? Why doesn’t He just stop it? How can a sinless being, God, allow sin to
continue?
The Parameters:
Before we begin to attempt to understand these questions and
their answers, I think that it is necessary to lay a groundwork of common
understanding. The first layer being
that the perspective from which I will be discussing this subject is one that
is rooted in the Judeo-Christian understanding of who God is.
To get to the second layer of foundation, we first must
dispel a common misconception about God to which many like to cling. One of the quotes I hear quite often is that
“My God is a God without boundaries,” or, “I love how wild my God is.” I understand what is meant by these statements,
and at first glance, they seem absolutely true.
I mean, how can an infinite being, namely God, be hemmed in by
anything? Even in the Bible, the common
rhetoric states that nothing is too hard for God. Is there anything He cannot do? Anything He
does not know? Any place He cannot be or
see? He is omnipotent. Omniscient.
Omnipresent. He is God! How can He have boundaries!?
What I would like to suggest is that rather than viewing God
as without boundaries, I would like to suggest that God, in fact, has absolute boundaries. For example, how would you feel if I said, “God
is whatever you think He is,” or, “God is whatever your experience tells you He
is.” Would you agree with me? Why not?
What I have just described for you is a god without boundaries. He has no structure; no lines he won’t cross. He is malleable and pliable; moldable and
wild. He will fit inside any box…or
outside of it if you don’t particularly like said box. He will change with a whim. The god I have just described actually does
not exist. The god I have just described
is a conjuring of the mind of man designed to conveniently take the place of
G-d, YHWH, LORD. The god I have just described
is comfortable and friendly, but he is NOT God.
Let’s reassess the
premise by asking the question, “What makes God…God?” Most would agree that the
Judeo-Christian God is perfect. This
would also mean that by default He IS NOT and CANNOT therefore be imperfect. We have our first agreed upon boundary: God cannot be imperfect. He will not ever cross this line and move
from perfection to imperfection. Most
will also agree that God is always truthful.
Again, by default, He will therefore never lie. We have our second agreed upon factual
boundary. God cannot and will not ever
lie. In the book of Jeremiah, the
prophet states that God condemns the Hebrews for making their children “pass
through the fire” referring to their sin of child sacrifice. Jeremiah goes on to prophesy that this kind
of sacrifice had “never entered [God’s] mind.”
This tells me that there are certain things, namely sin, that don’t even
cross God’s mind. Remember our first
parameter: He is perfect. This also
means that He is sinless. I would even
suggest based on the reference in Jeremiah that God can’t even come up with
sins to commit. He is completely other than human. He has the God nature.
The Fallacy:
Now that we have a bit of a foundation, let’s tackle tough
questions. A recurring claim by many is
that “God is unjust! He must be unjust
to allow suffering to exist. Who wants
to trust a God that allows bad things to happen to good people when He,
omnipotent as He is, could stop it if He wanted to. God is nothing more than a stubborn, selfish
kid with a mean streak and a magnifying glass, smiting we lowly ants below on
our anthill that is the Earth to get His kicks, and if that is who God is, I
don’t want any part of him. I would rather spend eternity in Hell than two
seconds with a God like that.” This is
the picture they see. This is their
understanding of God’s nature.
The Challenge:
The challenge, therefore, is to find the truth in the
answers to these questions, valid as they are.
First, from the rant above, is
God unjust? Let’s assume, based on our
previously laid groundwork, that if God is perfect and therefore also just,
then He cannot also be unjust at the same time.
He cannot cross the boundary to injustice. There must be a way to reconcile both
concepts: that God is just, and that injustice exists apart from God. The question is, “How can they both be
true?”
Second, how can a good God allow bad to happen? Again, these two concepts seem to be
irreconcilable. The dissonance with such
questions has caused many to altogether swear off God. The question remains, “Can God be good and He
still allow bad things to happen? Can
God be sinless, and still let sin run riot?”
The Answer:
My answer to this in its simplest form is that God has to let
sin run its course.
I know. I can hear
the dissenters screaming. To answer
them, no, God is not sadistic. God is
still not unjust.
To further explain what I mean, let us take an example from
the common subject of mathematics. Take the number “1”. It is only a representative of an actual
value: a single item. Take the number
“0”. What does it represent? Nothing.
“0” is only a placeholder meaning nothing is there. It is actually not even a number. It enumerates nothing; vacancy. To illustrate my point, would you know what
“0” was unless “1” was there first? The
only reason to have the number “0” is to represent the absence of “1” as it
were. “1” can never be “0” and “0” can
never be “1.” They can never be equal to
one another and can never cross paths with one another. They are separate, yet they are inseparable. Think also of matter and space. Space is what we call non-matter, yet the
only reason we know of space is because matter exists. The two are separate, but inseparable. Cold is the absence of Heat. Darkness is the absence of Light. Again, the two examples speak to a similar
relationship.
In the same way, God’s very existence also requires that
there be a non-God. There is God (the
number “1”) and there is non-God (the number “0”). The two cannot coexist, yet they cannot cease
existing together. To further explain,
let’s look at the general understanding of the angel Lucifer. He was the highest created being both in
wisdom and splendor, but he was not God.
Lucifer saw the very face of God
and ministered in His perfect presence, second only to God himself. He was created perfectly by God--but any
created being cannot itself be God. God
cannot create God. It would cease to be
God because God can’t be created. (We found another parameter). Lucifer failed. The closest creature to God
became filled with pride and rebellion and became perfect no longer. Sin entered. God’s perfect creation became imperfect. Why? The
answer is that Lucifer wasn’t God. Only
God himself can be perfect and remain perfect.
God remained God. Lucifer became
Satan, the non-God. Lucifer became the
placeholder “0.” God is “1.” Lucifer is “0.” Evil did not come from God, but from His
creation. Why? Creation is not God, and anything less than
God is not bound by the parameters of perfection as God Himself is bound. Only God can ever act like God all the
time. It is His nature: the God nature. Lucifer’s nature is the sin nature.
The question that springs from this is, “Why did God create
Lucifer if He (God), being omniscient, knew that Lucifer would rebel?” I
think the answer to this is that God’s goal from the beginning of time was to
put an end to sin. God wanted to
eradicate sin. How, though, can a
perfect God who cannot even invent a single sin to commit do away with it? How can God destroy something that doesn’t
even exist (before creation)? This is
why Lucifer was necessary. God could
have easily made no creation and been completely satisfied in Himself, but that
is not His nature. The God-nature loves,
blesses, shares, etc. God, from the
beginning, wanted to share His glory, but how could he do so since anything He
created would inevitably fail if left to its own devices, and thus be separated
from Him? The number “1,” remember,
can’t ever cross boundaries with the number “0.” Perfect God could never cross boundaries with
inevitably sinful creation. He had to
allow sin to exist, first in Lucifer, while God Himself remained free and
separate from sin, so that He could destroy sin once and for all. How else could He share His eternal glory and
perfection with creation? Creation would
fail without fail. God had to let sin
run its course in order to destroy it forever.
How could He accomplish this task? Only perfect God could be strong enough to
destroy sin. How, though, could he
destroy something He couldn’t touch? As
darkness flees the light, so also sin flees the presence of God. As silence is silenced with sound, so is sin
silenced by God. I believe this is why
Jesus, the God-man, was necessary. God had
to bridle himself with our weakness, with created flesh, so that He could touch
sinful creation, whom he loved, without destroying sinful creation in the
process. Perfect God divined a way to
coexist with sinful creation without necessarily destroying it. What’s more, He absorbed the sin nature of
creation in Himself, and He scandalously crossed the boundary, effectively
dividing by “0,” destroying the nothingness that is the sinful nature, the
non-God, the anti-God in Jesus. The Bible
is clear that it pleased God to crush Jesus.
I believe that it pleased Him because in crushing Jesus, the sinful
nature was also crushed…forever. Eternal
life was made free to all who wanted it.
God was free to share His glory with (formerly) sinful creation—without inevitably
destroying it. Sinful creation could now
coexist with sinless God without One naturally destroying the other. This was the only way it could have been
done. This was the most magnificent way
it could have been done.
I believe that this was the plan from before the beginning
of time (if there is such a thing as before time): that all of humanity,
creation, time, and space were created as a means of completely destroying sin,
something God couldn’t create, so that God’s righteous and holy nature could be
fully expressed by sharing Himself forever with His creation that He, Himself,
has purified and redeemed. This is why
God allows sin: so he can destroy sin without destroying you in the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment